(NOTE: This article is part of an ongoing series that documents an experiment with using AI to fill the NCAA brackets and see how it fares against years of human experience. The original article is as follows.)
This is the final entry in my series on using AI to help play March Madness pools. Like most stories, I had hoped this one would have a happy ending. Alas, my experiment using ChatGPT to help fill out my NCAA tournament brackets is best summed up as close, but no cigar.
Recommended Videos
And yet, I would still call the experiment a success.
That may sound odd coming from someone who did not win. But one of the biggest lessons from this exercise is that AI improved my process more than it improved certainty. In other words, it helped me think better, even if it could not eliminate the madness.
Last week, I was thrilled to
...Keep reading this article on Digital Trends.
